Repository footprint
Plans scale with the number of repositories and environments your team wants Primate reviewing on every pull request.
Pricing
Pricing that scales with the amount of QA coverage your team needs.
Primate plans are shaped around repository footprint, pull request volume, and how deep you want browser-based review automation to go. Start with the workflows that matter most, then expand from there.
How Pricing Works
Review volume
Usage aligns to how many pull requests and test sessions you need covered each month across your engineering org.
QA depth
Teams can expand into broader persona audits, evidence retention, and richer execution coverage as workflows mature.
Team
Most common
For product teams introducing automated PR QA into a few core repositories.
Custom
scoped with your team
Diff-aware review plans for active product repos.
Screenshot-backed findings posted to pull requests.
Recorded browser sessions for fast validation.
Scale
Growing orgs
For engineering organizations that need broader repo coverage and more frequent PR review automation.
Custom
scoped with your team
Expanded repository and reviewer coverage.
Higher monthly execution volume.
Support for deeper rollout and workflow planning.
Enterprise
Custom
For teams standardizing reviewer-style QA across multiple products, environments, and release processes.
Custom
scoped with your team
Tailored rollout across product surfaces.
Flexible volume and retention planning.
Hands-on onboarding for high-signal workflows.